4.5 Article

Mononuclear nickel (II) and copper (II) coordination complexes supported by bispicen ligand derivatives: Experimental and computational studies

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 455, 期 -, 页码 221-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2016.09.001

关键词

Transition metals; UV-vis spectroscopy; Nickel; Copper; EPR spectroscopy

资金

  1. University of Alabama in Huntsville
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. National Science Foundation [ACI-1053575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synthesis, characterization and density functional theory calculations of mononuclear Ni and Cu complexes supported by the N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-bis-(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)-1,2-diaminoethane ligand and its derivatives are reported. The complexes were characterized by X-ray crystallography as well as by UV-visible absorption spectroscopy and EPR spectroscopy. The solid state structure of these coordination complexes revealed that the geometry of the complex depended on the identity of the metal center. Solution phase characterization data are in accord with the solid phase structure, indicating minimal structural changes in solution. Optical spectroscopy revealed that all of the complexes exhibit color owing to d-d transition bands in the visible region. Magnetic parameters obtained from EPR spectroscopy together with other structural data suggest that the Ni(II) complexes are in a pseudo-octahedral geometry and Cu(II) complexes are in a distorted square pyramidal geometry. In order to understand in detail how ligand sterics and electronics affect complex topology detailed computational studies were performed. The series of complexes reported in this article will add significant value in the field of coordination chemistry as Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes supported by tetradentate pyridyl based ligands are rather scarce. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据