4.5 Article

Steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence studies on interactions of carbon quantum dots with nitrotoluenes

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 468, 期 -, 页码 300-307

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2017.05.058

关键词

Carbon dots; Nitrotoluenes; Fluorescence quenching; Charge transfer; Sensing

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) through the program of Dr. Kenneth Caster, Air Force Research Laboratory
  2. South Carolina Space Grant Consortium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon quantum dots or carbon dots, generally defined as small carbon nanoparticles with various surface passivation schemes, have emerged to represent a rapidly advancing and expanding research field. A wide variety of technological applications of carbon dots have been pursued, including especially their uses as fluorescence probes or sensors. In the work reported here, carbon dots obtained from the surface chemical functionalization of small carbon nanoparticles with 2,20-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylamine)(EDA) were selected as structurally compact and defined fluorescence probes, and their interactions with nitrotoluene compounds were studied on the basis of fluorescence quenching in steady-state and time-resolved measurements. The fluorescence quenching of the carbon dots by the nitrotoluenes, which are commonly used as signature compounds for nitroaromatic explosives, was found to be extremely efficient in ambient solution, though still at the very upper-limit of diffusion-control. There were some static quenching contributions at high nitrotoluene quencher concentrations, especially for the compound that is more electron deficient, which could be rationalized in terms of some near-neighbor charge transfer interactions. Mechanistic implications of the results and the potential for carbon dots to serve as highly sensitive fluorescence probes in the detection of nitroaromatic explosives are discussed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据