4.7 Article

Structural Stability from Crystallographic Shear in TiO2-Nb2O5 Phases: Cation Ordering and Lithiation Behavior of TiNb24O62

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 56, 期 7, 页码 4002-4010

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b03154

关键词

-

资金

  1. FRM II
  2. Winston Churchill Foundation of the United States
  3. Herchel Smith Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The host structure and reversible lithium insertion and extraction of an intercalation compound, TiNb24O62, are described. Neutron diffraction, applied for the first time to TiNb24O62, allowed an accurate refinement of the complex block superstructure, particularly with respect to the oxygen sublattice. Analysis of the transition-metal sites revealed significant cation ordering in the mixed-metal oxide. Electrochemical analysis demonstrated highly reversible lithium intercalation with ca. 190 mA.h.g(-1) after 100 cycles (C/10 rate, 3 months). The effect of the potential window on the capacity, polarization, and reversibility was carefully examined; a minimum voltage limit of 1.1-1.2 V is critical for efficient and reversible cycling. The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique revealed three solid-solution regions, with different lithium diffusivities, in addition to the two-phase plateau that was clearly observed in the V versus Q discharge/charge profile. Lithium-ion diffusion decreases by over 3 orders of magnitude from the dilute lithium limit early in the discharge to the lithium-stuffed phase Li-37.5(1.0)TiNb24O62. Nevertheless, prior to lithium stuffing, TiNb24O62 possesses intrinsically rapid lithium-ion kinetics, as demonstrated by the high-rate performance in thick films of ca. 10 mu m particles when interfaced with a carbon-coated aluminum foil substrate. The TiO2Nb2O5 phase diagram is examined and electrochemical results are compared to related superstructures of crystallographically sheared blocks of octahedra in the TiO2Nb2O5 homologous series including the H-Nb2O5 end member.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据