4.5 Article

Quality attributes and quality models for ambient assisted living software systems: A systematic mapping

期刊

INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 121-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2016.10.005

关键词

Quality attribute; Quality model; Ambient assisted living; Systematic mapping; ISO/IEC 25010

资金

  1. Capes/Nuffic [034/12]
  2. FAPESP [2015/19192-2, 2014/02244-7, 2013/20317-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) has become an essential, multidisciplinary research topic, aiming at providing software systems and services that assist people in their everyday life activities. Considering the critical nature of AAL systems, several initiatives have already contributed to the improvement of their quality, by mainly focusing on their non-functional requirements. Despite the importance of quality assurance in AAL systems, there is a lack of a comprehensive analysis on how quality assurance is performed in such systems. This fact might in turn lead to an absence of standardization with regard to the quality assurance process of these systems. Objective: We provide a broad, detailed panorama about the state of the art on quality models (QMs) and quality attributes (QAs) that are important for the AAL domain. Method: We performed a Systematic Mapping (SM). We used six publication databases to cover all published material pertinent for our SM. We initially obtained 287 studies that were filtered based on a set of well-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, resulting into a set of 27 studies that were used for exploring QAs for ML systems. Results: The most common QAs used in the development of ML systems were identified and defined. We also characterized important critical attributes for software systems in the AAL domain. Additionally, QAs for some ML sub-domains were defined. Furthermore, we investigated how QM&QA have been defined, evaluated, and used in that domain. Finally, we offered an analysis of the maturity of the studies identified in our SM. Conclusion: It is necessary to develop a complete QM that: (i) defines all common QAs for AAL systems; (ii) considers variability of QAs among ML sub-domains; (iii) analyses dependences among QAs; (iv) offers indicators or metrics to measure QAs; and (v) offers means to assess and predict quality of AAL systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据