期刊
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 56, 期 27, 页码 7865-7876出版社
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01862
关键词
-
资金
- National Energy Technology Laboratory Research Participation Program - U.S. Department of Energy
Several discrete particle methods exist in the open literature to simulate fluidized bed systems, such as discrete element method (DEM), time-driven hard sphere (TDHS), coarse-grained particle method (CGPM), coarse grained hard sphere (CGHS), and multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC). The main difference between these methods is in the treatment of particleparticle interactions: by calculating collision forces (DEM and CGPM), using momentum conservation laws (TDHS and CGHS), or based on the particle stress model (MP-PIC). Here, these methods are compared by simulating the same small-scale fluidized bed with the same open-source code MFIX. The results indicate that both modeling the particleparticle collision by TDHS and lumping a few particles in a parcel increase the computation speed with little loss in accuracy. However, the MP-PIC method predicts an unphysical particleparticle overlap, which results in incorrect overall bed hydrodynamics. These results suggest using the CGHS method for fluidized bed simulations owing to its accuracy and efficiency.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据