4.8 Article

Isoforms of Melanopsin Mediate Different Behavioral Responses to Light

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 18, 页码 2430-2434

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.071

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [090684/Z/09/Z, 098461/Z/12/Z]
  2. BBSRC [BB/I021086/1]
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche
  4. BBSRC [BB/I021086/1, BB/M009998/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0900887] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I021086/1, BB/M009998/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0900887] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Melanopsin (OPN4) is a retinal photopigment that mediates a wide range of non-image-forming (NIF) responses to light [1, 2] including circadian entrainment [3], sleep induction [4], the pupillary light response (PLR) [5], and negative masking of locomotor behavior (the acute suppression of activity in response to light) [6]. How these diverse NIF responses can all be mediated by a single photopigment has remained a mystery. We reasoned that the alternative splicing of melanopsin could provide the basis for functionally distinct photopigments arising from a single gene. The murine melanopsin gene is indeed alternatively spliced, producing two distinct isoforms, a short (OPN4S) and a long (OPN4L) isoform, which differ only in their C terminus tails [7]. Significantly, both isoforms form fully functional photopigments [7]. Here, we show that different isoforms of OPN4 mediate different behavioral responses to light. By using RNAi-mediated silencing of each isoform in vivo, we demonstrated that the short isoform (OPN4S) mediates light-induced pupillary constriction, the long isoform (OPN4L) regulates negative masking, and both isoforms contribute to phase-shifting circadian rhythms of locomotor behavior and light-mediated sleep induction. These findings demonstrate that splice variants of a single receptor gene can regulate strikingly different behaviors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据