4.7 Article

Construction of Refined Protein Interaction Network for Predicting Essential Proteins

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2017.2665482

关键词

Essential protein; PPI network; gene-expression; subcellular location

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61370024, 61622213, 31560317]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identification of essential proteins based on protein interaction network (PIN) is a very important and hot topic in the post genome era. Up to now, a number of network-based essential protein discovery methods have been proposed. Generally, a static protein interaction network was constructed by using the protein-protein interactions obtained from different experiments or databases. Unfortunately, most of the network-based essential protein discovery methods are sensitive to the reliability of the constructed PIN. In this paper, we propose a new method for constructing refined PIN by using gene expression profiles and subcellular location information. The basic idea behind refining the PIN is that two proteins should have higher possibility to physically interact with each other if they appear together at the same subcellular location and are active together at least at a time point in the cell cycle. The original static PIN is denoted by S-PIN while the final PIN refined by our method is denoted by TS-PIN. To evaluate whether the constructed TS-PIN is more suitable to be used in the identification of essential proteins, 10 network-based essential protein discovery methods (DC, EC, SC, BC, CC, IC, LAC, NC, BN, and DMNC) are applied on it to identify essential proteins. A comparison of TS-PIN and two other networks: S-PIN and NF-APIN (a noise-filtered active PIN constructed by using gene expression data and S-PIN) is implemented on the prediction of essential proteins by using these ten network-based methods. The comparison results show that all of the 10 network-based methods achieve better results when being applied on TS-PIN than that being applied on S-PIN and NF-APIN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据