4.7 Article

Graph PCA Hashing for Similarity Search

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 2033-2044

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2017.2703636

关键词

Hashing; image retrieval; manifold learning; similarity search; spectral clustering

资金

  1. China Key Research Program [2016YFB1000905]
  2. China 973 Program [2013CB329404]
  3. China 1000-Plan National Distinguished Professorship
  4. Nation Natural Science Foundation of China [61573270, 61761130079, 61363009, 61672177]
  5. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2015GXNSFCB139011]
  6. Guangxi High Institutions Program of Introducing 100 High-Level Overseas Talents
  7. Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Multi-Source Information Integration and Intelligent Processing
  8. Guangxi Key Lab of MIMS [16-A-01-01, 16-A-01-02]
  9. Guangxi Bagui Teams for Innovation and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new hashing framework to conduct similarity search via the following steps: first, employing linear clustering methods to obtain a set of representative data points and a set of landmarks of the big dataset; second, using the landmarks to generate a probability representation for each data point. The proposed probability representation method is further proved to preserve the neighborhood of each data point. Third, PCA is integrated with manifold learning to lean the hash functions using the probability representations of all representative data points. As a consequence, the proposed hashing method achieves efficient similarity search (with linear time complexity) and effective hashing performance and high generalization ability (simultaneously preserving two kinds of complementary similarity structures, i.e., local structures via manifold learning and global structures via PCA). Experimental results on four public datasets clearly demonstrate the advantages of our proposed method in terms of similarity search, compared to the state-of-the-art hashing methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据