4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Modeling and Assessment Analysis of Various Compensation Topologies in Bidirectional IWPT System for EV Applications

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
卷 53, 期 5, 页码 4973-4984

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2017.2700281

关键词

Bidirectional; compensation topologies; electric vehicle (EV); steady-state model; vehicle-to-grid (V2G); wireless power transfer (WPT)

资金

  1. Grant for the Office of Naval Research
  2. Grant for the U.S. Department of Energy
  3. Cultural Affairs and Missions Sector, Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric vehicle (EV) can act as an energy consuming device or a distributed energy resource in the concepts known as vehicle-to-grid (V2G) and grid-to-vehicle (G2V). The bidirectional wireless power interface is a successful choice for this application, since it provides automatic, reliable, and safe operation. Therefore, this paper presents modeling and assessment analysis for the steady-state performance of bidirectional inductive wireless power transfer system (BIWPTS) in EV implementations. The analysis is presented for the three main compensation configurations: LC-series, LC-parallel, and LCL-topology. Moreover, the steady-state equivalent circuit-based mathematical models for all topologies are developed. These models were used to precisely determine the system response during V2G and G2V operations based on Fourier series. The study presents evident criteria to pick among the different BIWPTS structures in the diverse applications. The proposed analyses were verified both in simulation and experiment. The results demonstrate the ability of the proposed models to provide accurate estimation for BIWPTS performance under various operating and control conditions. Also, the evaluation analysis shows that LCL-topology is more appropriate for the bidirectional operation due to the simple design and control requirements, and being less sensitive to the misalignment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据