4.5 Article

Peptides of the variable IgG domain as potential biomarker candidates in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG)

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 26, 期 22, 页码 4451-4464

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddx332

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autoantibody profiling has gained increasing interest in the research field of glaucoma promising the detection of highly specific and sensitive marker candidates for future diagnostic purposes. Recent studies demonstrated that immune responses are characterized by the expression of congruent or similar complementarity determining regions (CDR) in different individuals and could be used as molecular targets in biomarker discovery. Main objective of this study was to characterize glaucoma-specific peptides from the variable region of sera-derived immunoglobulins using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based quantitative proteomics. IgG was purified from sera of 13 primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) and 15 controls (CTRL) and subsequently digested into Fab and Fc by papain. Fab was further purified, tryptic digested and measured by LC-MS/MS. Discovery proteomics revealed in total 75 peptides of the variable IgG domain showing significant glaucoma-related level changes (P < 0.05; log2 fold change >= 0.5): 6 peptides were high abundant in POAG sera, whereas 69 peptides were low abundant in comparison to CTRL group. Via accurate inclusion mass screening strategy 28 IgG V domain peptides were further validated showing significantly decreased expression levels in POAG sera. Amongst others 5 CDR1, 2 CDR2 and 1 CDR3 sequences. In addition, we observed significant shifts in the variable heavy chain family distribution and disturbed kappa/lambda ratios in POAG patients in contrast to CTRL. These findings strongly indicate that glaucoma is accompanied by systemic effects on antibody production and B cell maturation possibly offering new prospects for future diagnostic or therapy purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据