4.2 Review

Perioperative depression or anxiety and postoperative mortality in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 1458-1468

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-017-1022-3

关键词

Anxiety; Cardiac surgery; Depression; Meta-analysis; Mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether perioperative depression and anxiety are associated with increased postoperative mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched through January 2017 using PubMed and OVID, to identify observational studies enrolling patients undergoing cardiac surgery and reporting relative risk estimates (RREs) (including odds, hazard, or mortality ratios) of short term (30 days or in-hospital) and/or late all-cause mortality for patients with versus without perioperative depression or anxiety. Study-specific estimates were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of logarithmic RREs in the random-effects models. Our search identified 16 eligible studies. In total, the present meta-analysis included data on 236,595 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Pooled analysis demonstrated that perioperative depression was significantly associated with increased both postoperative early (RRE, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.05; p = 0.05) and late mortality (RRE, 1.44; 95% CI 1.24-1.67; p < 0.0001), and that perioperative anxiety significantly correlated with increased postoperative late mortality (RRE, 1.81; 95% CI 1.20-2.72; p = 0.004). The relation between anxiety and early mortality was reported in only one study and not statistically significant. In the association of depression with late mortality, there was no evidence of significant publication bias and meta-regression indicated that the effects of depression are not modulated by the duration of follow-up. In conclusion, perioperative depression and anxiety may be associated with increased postoperative mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据