4.7 Article

The applicability of microbially induced calcite precipitation (MICP) for internal erosion control in gravel-sand mixtures

期刊

GEOTECHNIQUE
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 42-55

出版社

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jgeot.15.P.182

关键词

dams; erosion; gravels; laboratory tests; reinforced soils; sands

资金

  1. Cambridge Commonwealth, European & International Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seepage-induced internal erosion in earth-filled embankment dams has been attracting the attention of civil engineering researchers and practitioners for decades. Microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP), owing to its proved performance in soil enhancement and permeability control, can potentially be used for internal erosion control. This paper examines the applicability of MICP for internal erosion control in gravel-sand mixtures using a large one-dimensional column test apparatus which incorporates the implementation of MICP. Visual observations, erosion characteristics and hydro-mechanical behaviours of non-MICP and MICP treated gravel-sand mixtures were investigated through a series of constant-pressure erosion tests. Test results confirm that MICP treatment can reduce the cumulative erosion weight, erosion rate and axial strain relative to non-MICP soil. The magnitudes of hydraulic conductivity for all tested samples before the erosion process fall into a range from 5.5 x 10(-5) to 8.0 x 10(-3) m/s. After the erosion process, non-MICP soils and MICP treated soils with low cementation concentrations experience a significant increase in hydraulic conductivity. Furthermore, a hydro-mechanical coupling analysis was conducted and different erosion modes were identified for low and high concentrations of cementation solution. Fundamentally, the efficiency of internal erosion reduction is controlled by the calcium carbonate precipitation content within the tested soils. Higher precipitation content can facilitate the formation of larger clusters of cemented sand particles, thus reducing the likelihood of erosion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据