4.7 Article

Effect of Snow Salinity on CryoSat-2 Arctic First-Year Sea Ice Freeboard Measurements

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 44, 期 20, 页码 10419-10426

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074506

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Polar Continental Shelf Project (PCSP)
  3. Northern Scientific Training Program (NSTP)
  4. Centre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba
  5. German Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy [50EE1008]
  6. EU project SIDARUS
  7. [REKLIM-2013-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The European Space Agency's CryoSat-2 satellite mission provides radar altimeter data that are used to derive estimates of sea ice thickness and volume. These data are crucial to understanding recent variability and changes in Arctic sea ice. Sea ice thickness retrievals at the CryoSat-2 frequency require accurate measurements of sea ice freeboard, assumed to be attainable when the main radar scattering horizon is at the snow/sea ice interface. Using an extensive snow thermophysical property dataset from late winter conditions in the Canadian Arctic, we examine the role of saline snow on first-year sea ice (FYI), with respect to its effect on the location of the main radar scattering horizon, its ability to decrease radar penetration depth, and its impact on FYI thickness estimates. Based on the dielectric properties of saline snow commonly found on FYI, we quantify the vertical shift in the main scattering horizon. This is found to be approximately 0.07 m. We propose a thickness-dependent snow salinity correction factor for FYI freeboard estimates. This significantly reduces CryoSat-2 FYI retrieval error. Relative error reductions of similar to 11% are found for an ice thickness of 0.95 m and similar to 25% for 0.7 m. Our method also helps to close the uncertainty gap between SMOS and CryoSat-2 thin ice thickness retrievals. Our results indicate that snow salinity should be considered for FYI freeboard estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据