4.7 Article

First in situ observations of binary raindrop collisions

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 44, 期 2, 页码 1175-1181

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL072516

关键词

rainfall; raindrop; raindrop size distribution; raindrop collision; collision rate; raindrop breakup

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AGS-1612681, AGS-1144846]
  2. Directorate For Geosciences
  3. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1612681] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, we present the first-time observations of binary raindrop collisions in rainfall events. These observations constitute a critical step in concluding a long-standing debate on the controlling physical process, binary raindrop collision versus spontaneous raindrop breakup, for the raindrop size distribution (DSD) evolution from cloud to ground level. Our raindrop collision observations were made possible by a new instrument called the High-speed Optical Disdrometer (HOD) that we recently developed for precipitation microphysics investigations. Our approximately 1year long field campaign that covered 33 rainfall events provided 11 observations of binary raindrop collisions and outcomes but no spontaneous breakup observation. The field-observed collision rate (i.e., number of raindrop collisions within the measurement volume of the HOD per unit time) showed an increasing trend with increasing rain rate as expected from the theoretical collision rate predictions. Furthermore, the field-observed collision rates were (i) comparable (for rain rates less than approximately 50mm/h) and (ii) significantly larger (for larger rain rates) than the theoretically predicted rates that have been used in various numerical investigations that suggest the controlling role of raindrop collisions in DSD evolution. Our observations, yet to be supplemented with observations from comprehensive field campaigns at different geographic locations and rainfall events for a definitive conclusion, support the collision-driven DSD evolution hypothesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据