4.7 Article

Latitude and lake size are important predictors of over-lake atmospheric stability

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 44, 期 17, 页码 8875-8883

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073941

关键词

-

资金

  1. EUSTACE from the EU Horizon Programme for Research and Innovation [640171]
  2. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change
  3. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research [CRN3038]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) Arctic Observing Network (AON) [1107792]
  5. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT21-2]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. ICER [1459322] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Directorate For Geosciences
  9. ICER [1128040] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Office of Polar Programs (OPP)
  11. Directorate For Geosciences [1107792] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh020010] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. NERC [ceh020010] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turbulent fluxes across the air-water interface are integral to determining lake heat budgets, evaporation, and carbon emissions from lakes. The stability of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) influences the exchange of turbulent energy. We explore the differences in over-lake ABL stability using data from 39 globally distributed lakes. The frequency of unstable ABL conditions varied between lakes from 71 to 100% of the time, with average air temperatures typically several degrees below the average lake surface temperature. This difference increased with decreasing latitude, resulting in a more frequently unstable ABL and a more efficient energy transfer to and from the atmosphere, toward the tropics. In addition, during summer the frequency of unstable ABL conditions decreased with increasing lake surface area. The dependency of ABL stability on latitude and lake size has implications for heat loss and carbon fluxes from lakes, the hydrologic cycle, and climate change effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据