4.7 Article

Catalytic cracking of fast and tail gas reactive pyrolysis bio-oils over HZSM-5

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 132-138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.03.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. USDA-NIFA-BRDI Grant [2012-10008-20271]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) of pyrolysis oil is well understood as an upgrading method; however, the high processing pressures associated with it alone justify the exploration of alternative upgrading solutions, especially those that could adapt pyrolysis oils into the existing refinery infrastructure. Catalytic cracking is one such alternative industrial practice that can be carried out at near-atmospheric pressure using zeolite-based FCC catalysts. The present study focuses on the catalytic cracking of pyrolysis oil of different starting compositions over HZSM-5 to inform the extent of upgrading in the liquid phase. After establishing a catalyst bed temperature of 500 degrees C as the optimum operating condition with regard to deoxygenation and yield of mono-aromatics in the products obtained, the performances of conventional pyrolysis and tail gas reactive pyrolysis (TGRP) bio-oils as starting liquids for the cracking were compared. The results indicate that the formation of naphthalenes was favored, while the formation of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX) compounds was slightly depressed in the case of the TGRP oil. We attribute this finding to the formation of naphthalenes from BTEX molecules already found in the TGRP oil. Subsequent reuse of the catalysts showed that the cracking of TGRP bio-oil exhibited slightly greater deactivation after a third cycle, likely due to the increased formation of naphthalenes and coke which can block HZSM-5 pores. The results obtained from this study will help determine the issues that need to be addressed when developing a-catalytic cracker with HZSM-5 for regular pyrolysis oil-and TGRP oil. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据