4.7 Article

Semiclathrate hydrates of methane plus tetraalkylammonium hydroxides

期刊

FUEL
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 618-626

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.005

关键词

Methane hydrate; Semiclathrate hydrate; Phase equilibrium; Gas uptake; Organic salt; Gas hydrate promotion

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [1092846]
  2. University of Queensland International Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clathrate hydrate crystallisation is a promising method for the capture, storage and transport of methane, but one of its major technical barriers is the high pressure required for hydrate formation. In search of suitable and cost-effective promoters for hydrate-based gas processing and handling, this paper reports the pressures required for the formation of clathrate hydrates of methane in the presence of one of the following three quaternary ammonium salts with the same anion (OH-) but different carbon chain lengths: tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPrAOH), tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH), and tetrapentylammonium hydroxide (TPeAOH). The phase boundary between hydrate-liquid-vapor (H-L-V) phases and liquid-vapor (L-V) phases in the temperature range of 281.81-301.91 K and pressure range of 4.46-16.05 MPa was determined using an isochoric equilibrium step-heating pressure search method. The results show that TBAOH is a strong thermodynamic promoter for methane hydrate formation whereas TPrAOH and TPeAOH are weak hydrate inhibitors. We then compared the phase equilibrium conditions and gas storage capacities of TBAOH and a widely studied hydrate promoter, tetrabutylammoium bromide (TBAB). It was found that at a given dosage, TBAOH substantially outperformed TBAB in thermodynamically promotingmethane hydrate formation and with an appropriate driving force TBAOH gave only slightly lower methane storage capacity than TBAB. These features make TBAOH a prospective promoter for hydrate-based methane storage and transport. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据