4.7 Article

Investigation on co-gasification of coal and biomass in Shell gasifier by using a validated gasification model

期刊

FUEL
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 371-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.103

关键词

CFD; Shell gasifier; Co-gasification; Coal; Biomass

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning [NRF-2015R1A2A1A01003890]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2015R1A2A1A01003890] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-utilization of coal and biomass in a power plant can reduce the overall CO2 emission by partly displacing fossil-fuel combustion with near-carbon-neutral combustion of biomass. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of co-gasification is conducted using a validated gasification model to examine the effect of biomass amount on the co-gasification process in a Shell gasifier. In the sub-models for coal and biomass char reactions, pore and bulk diffusions are considered using a user-defined function. The coal (Douglas premium coal, South Africa) and biomass (wood pellet treated from sawdust of pine and oak in South Korea) blend ratios (based on calorific value) are 0.0 (coal 100%), 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2. The CFD model is validated using the actual operating data of the integrated gasification combined cycle plant located in Puertollano, Spain. The CO concentration decreases but that of H-2 increases with increasing blend ratio. The cold gas efficiencies range between 82.8% and 88.1%, and the carbon conversion efficiencies are higher than 99.8% for all blend ratios. These efficiencies are similar to those of coal gasification. However, blend ratios of 0.15 and 0.2 are not appropriate for co-gasification because the exit temperatures calculated for these two blend ratios are 1708 and 1621 K, respectively, in which both are lower than the critical slag viscosity temperature (1753 K) of the coal used in this study. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据