4.7 Article

The impact of various ethanol-gasoline blends on particulates and unregulated gaseous emissions characteristics from a spark ignition direct injection (SIDI) passenger vehicle

期刊

FUEL
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 702-712

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.063

关键词

Ethanol; Gasoline direct injection; Particulate matter; Nano-particle; Aldehyde; Volatile organic compound

资金

  1. BK21 plus program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Education of Korea and Korea University Grant [21A20131712520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of various ethanol-gasoline blends on the hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emissions from a wall-guided direct injection passenger vehicle. The fuel economy (FE) as well as regulated and unregulated gaseous emissions was evaluated on a chassis dynamometer using the federal test procedure (FTP-75) mode. Five fuels with varying ethanol contents of E0, E10, E30, E50, and E85 were prepared by blending ethanol into commercial gasoline on a volumetric basis and were analyzed each fuel specification. The engine control schemes of fuel injection quantity for various ethanol blends were adjusted to optimize the engine starting capability, vehicle drivability and emissions performance. The FE of the E85 fueled vehicle decreased by 29% relative to gasoline fuel due to the low energy content of ethanol. Blending ethanol into gasoline produced a dramatic decrease of particulate emission, because pure ethanol has no aromatic compounds and carbon content lower than that of gasoline. As a result, nano-particles were rarely emitted in the vehicle tests of fuels with more than 30% ethanol. Carbonyl compounds emissions, which originate from partial oxidization or incomplete combustion of ethanol, also rose sharply as the ethanol content increased, while volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions were reduced considerably with medium-and high-ethanol formulations due to the lower proportion of aromatic components in these fuels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据