4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study on the emission characteristics of laminar premixed biogas-hydrogen impinging flame

期刊

FUEL
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 1-11

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.056

关键词

Total emissions; Flame impingement; NO formation; NO2 production; Biogas-hydrogen fuel

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR [B-Q39F]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The total emissions (EICO, EINOx, EINO2 and NO2/NOx ratio) of laminar premixed biogas-hydrogen impinging flame were obtained experimentally while a computational model was developed to calculate the impinging flame. The NO amount produced via different routes (thermal, prompt, NNH and N2O routes) were isolated and calculated in the simulation. The effects of separated distance and equivalence ratio on the emission formation were discussed quantitatively. The results are summarized as follows. The lower values of EICO at small and large H are caused by the weakened fuel oxidization and improved CO oxidization, respectively, and the EICO is increased with phi owing to the increasingly incomplete fuel oxidization. The NO amounts of thermal, prompt, NNH and N2O routes and their contributions on total NO are affected considerably by the separated distance. The decreased prompt NO with H leads to the initial drop of EINOx at fuel-rich condition. The thermal NO and NNH route dominate the NO formation at phi = 0.8 and 1.0, while the contribution of prompt NO is improved significantly at fuel -rich condition. The rising trend of EINOx with phi is primarily predominated by the enhanced prompt NO. As H is enhanced, the rising and dropping trends of EINO2, as well as NO2/NOx ratio, are caused by more intensive air entrainment, promoting the NO2 formation, and the extended high temperature region, accelerating the NO formation and the NO2 destruction, respectively. The enhanced EINO2 with phi is primarily caused by the increased H atom in the air mixing region to promote the HO2 formation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据