4.7 Article

Coarse woody decay rates vary by physical position in tropical seasonal rainforests of SW China

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 206-213

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.033

关键词

Decomposition; Coarse woody debris; Nutrient release; Tropical forest; Wood decay

类别

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences 135 program [XTBG-T03]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [39800024, 30370247]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the CAS [2014174]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decomposition of woody detritus is an important but often ignored process in forest ecosystems. Moisture and temperature regimes are dominant controls over woody decay, contributing to significant variability at local, regional, and global scales. Our focus was on local variability in woody decay rates depending on their physical position. Woody detritus may decay on the forest floor, aboveground, or combination of both, depending on the mortality agent. In this study, we measured decay rates of logs, large branches on the forest floor, and snags over a three-year period. We also collected monthly respiration estimates, and analyzed woody detritus N and P content throughout the study. Logs exhibited the greatest mass loss with a decay-rate constant of k = 0.606 +/- 0.020, followed by large branches (k = 0.316 +/- 0.012) and snags (k = 0.268 +/- 0.008). Heterotrophic respiration was greatest prior to the peak of rainy season, and was greatest for snag material during the first two years of sampling, probably a result of water saturation in ground material. Both N and P were released in all materials, but the rate of P release was much slower in snags. There were large differences of P concentration and C:P among the materials, but their value became similar after three years, indicating P limitation on microbial activities. Our results presented robust evidence for the physical-position-dependence of coarse woody detritus decomposition in the forests. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据