4.7 Article

Pyrrhic victory for bark beetles: Successful standing tree colonization triggers strong intraspecific competition for offspring of Ips sexdentatus

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 399, 期 -, 页码 188-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.05.044

关键词

Brood productivity; Critical threshold of attack densities; Fitness; Pinus pinaster

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most bark beetles living on standing trees must overcome the natural resistance of their host to succeed in colonization. For this they perform mass attacks to reach a critical threshold of attack density (CTAD) above which host defences are exhausted. However, this strategy can result in an intense intraspecific competition during larval development. Consequently, the ability of a bark beetle species to sustain outbreaks on standing trees would be conditioned by three key factors: the value of CTAD; the ability of attacking beetles to stop accumulating after CTAD has been reached; and the ability of offspring to tolerate intraspecific competition. To test these hypotheses, we assessed attack and colonization densities of Ips sexdentatus during an outbreak, and estimated CTAD, using a stand-scale approach, in nine maritime pine stands. We also estimated the effect of intraspecific competition on the productivity and fitness of I. sexdentatus offspring, testing increasing rearing densities in the laboratory. The overall CTAD of I. sexdentatus on standing maritime pines was 142 attacks/m(2). CTAD varied among stands and ranged from 53 to 177 attacks/m(2). In several stands, attack densities raised much above local CTAD. Ips sexdentatus exhibited a low tolerance to intraspecific competition. The number of offspring per female and the fitness of emerging adults decreased exponentially with increasing rearing density. Excessive attack densities and negative feedback on offspring quantity and quality are likely to trigger rapid collapse of outbreaks. This supports the prediction that I. sexdentatus is an opportunistically aggressive species. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据