4.1 Article

Clonal integration affects allocation in the perennial herb Alternanthera philoxeroides in N-limited homogeneous environments

期刊

FOLIA GEOBOTANICA
卷 52, 期 3-4, 页码 303-315

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12224-016-9273-9

关键词

allocation; clonal plant; developmental stage; physiological integration; soil nitrogen

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2015ZCQ-BH-01]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1201100]
  3. NSFC [31570413]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most work on clonal growth in plants has focused on the advantages of clonality in heterogeneous habitats. We hypothesized (1) that physiological integration of connected ramets within a clone can also increase plant performance in homogeneous environments, (2) that this effect depends on whether ramets differ in ability to take up resources, and (3) that only ramets with relatively low uptake ability benefit. We tested these hypotheses using the perennial amphibious herb Alternanthera philoxeroides. We grew clonal fragments and varied numbers of rooted versus unrooted ramets, connection between the apical and basal parts of fragments, and availability of nitrogen. Patterns of final size and mass of fragments did not support these hypotheses. By some measures, severance did reduce the growth of more apical ramets and increase the growth of less apical ones, consistent with net apical transfer of resources. Rooting of individual ramets strongly influenced their growth: second and third most apical ramets each grew most when they were the most apical rooted ramet, and this pattern was more pronounced under higher nitrogen levels. This adds to the evidence that signalling between ramets is an important aspect of clonal integration. Overall, the results indicate that physiological integration between ramets within clones in homogeneous environments can alter the allocation of resources between connected ramets even when it does not affect the total growth of clonal fragments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据