4.7 Article

Hepatopancreas transcriptome analysis of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) with white hepatopancreas syndrome

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 70, 期 -, 页码 302-307

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.08.031

关键词

E. sinensis; White hepatopancreas syndrome; Comparative transcriptome; Differential expression

资金

  1. Agriculture Research System of Shanghai, China [201704]
  2. Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China [G2017-02-08-00-10-F00076]
  3. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [16391905300, 13DZ2251800]
  4. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [A1-2039-17-0011]
  5. Shanghai Ocean University [A2-0203-00-100315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White hepatopancreas is a syndrome that has recently emerged in aquaculture of Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis). High lethality of the disease caused large economic loss, which drew considerable attention of fish farmers and scientific researchers. In this study, hepatopancreas reference transcriptome was de novo assembled and differential expression analysis was conducted between white hepatopancreas and normal (yellow) hepatopancreas of E. sinensis. A total of 90,687 transcripts were assembled, and 27,387 were annotated. Transcriptomic comparison revealed 69 differentially expressed genes between individuals featuring white hepatopancreas and yellow hepatopancreas. Genes associated with immune response and cell death, include thioredoxin-related transmembrane protein 1, hemocytin, methuselah-like 1, and E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase, and they were up-regulated, whereas titin and 5-formyltetrahydrofolate cyclo-ligase, which are genes related to cell proliferation, were down-regulated in E. sinensis with white hepatopancreas syndrome. Our study provides novel insights into genetic causes of formation and novel gene markers for detection of white hepatopancreas syndrome in aqua culture of E. sinensis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据