4.2 Article

Production of the copolymer poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) with varied composition using different nitrogen sources with Haloferax mediterranei

期刊

EXTREMOPHILES
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1037-1047

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00792-017-0964-9

关键词

Haloferax mediterranei; Nitrogen limitation; Nitrate; Polyhydroxyalkanoates; Copolymer; Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J014478/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [1499289] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extreme haloarchaea Haloferax mediterranei accumulates poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) without the need for specific precursors. In this study, growth kinetics and PHBV synthesis were characterised under nitrogen-excess and nitrogen-limiting conditions in ammonium and, for the first time, nitrate. With excess nitrogen, ammonium and nitrate cultures generated 10.7 g/L biomass containing 4.6 wt% PHBV and 5.6 g/L biomass with 9.3 wt% PHBV, respectively. Copolymer composition varied with the nitrogen source used: PHBV from ammonium cultures had 16.9 mol% 3-hydroxyvalerate (HV), while PHBV from nitrate cultures contained 12.5 mol% HV. Nitrogen limitation was achieved with carbon-to-nitrogen (C/N) molar ratios of 25 or higher. Nitrogen limitation reduced biomass generation and polymer concentration, but polymer accumulation increased to 6.6 and 9.4% for ammonium and nitrate, respectively, with C/N 42. PHBV composition was also affected and cultures with lower C/N ratios produced richer HV polymers. Copolymer formation was not a uniform process: HV was only detected after a minimum accumulation of 0.45 g/L PHB and lasted for a maximum of 48 h. The understanding of copolymer synthesis and the influence of culture conditions such as the nitrogen source will help in designing novel strategies for the production of PHBV with more regular structure and material properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据