4.3 Article

Physiological redox signalling and regulation of ion channels: implications for pulmonary hypertension

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 102, 期 9, 页码 1078-1082

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/EP086040

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [087776]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pulmonary hypertension is associated with oxidant stress and increased generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by NADPH oxidases (NOX), mitochondria and other sources. There is considerable evidence that these contribute to the aetiology via promotion of pulmonary vascular remodelling, endothelial dysfunction and enhanced vasoreactivity. However, it is now recognized that ROS act as important signalling mediators and second messengers in normal physiological conditions. Many ion channels and protein kinases crucial to pulmonary vascular function are directly or indirectly affected by redox/ROS, including K+, Ca2+ and non-selective cation channels and Rho kinase. However, the inherent difficulties in quantifying ROS, particularly in subcellular compartments, make it uncertain whether these reported effects are of relevance in physiological rather than pathological conditions. In an attempt to address such issues, we have focused on the role of physiologically generated ROS in the regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-activated vasoconstrictor pathways. We have recently reported a novel mechanism whereby low concentrations of GPCR-linked vasoconstrictors greatly potentiate Ca2+ entry via a NOX1- and ROS-mediated pathway parallel to the classical vasoconstrictor pathways of Ca2+ mobilization and activation of Rho kinase. Our findings imply that ROS signalling is highly compartmentalized in physiological conditions, but that this may be compromised by pathological increases in oxidant production, for example in pulmonary hypertension, leading to promiscuous actions that contribute to the aetiology. This model is consistent with the proposal that targeted antioxidants could prove to be an effective therapy for pulmonary hypertension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据