4.6 Article

Protean proteases: at the cutting edge of lung diseases

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01200-2015

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [82DZL00401, 82DZL004A1]
  2. Region Centre-Val de Loire (France) (BPCO-Lyse project)
  3. German Center for Lung Research (DZL)
  4. Slovene Research Agency [P1-0140]
  5. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-14-CE15-0010-01]
  6. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [FRM AJE201121]
  7. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE15-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteases were traditionally viewed as mere protein-degrading enzymes with a very restricted spectrum of substrates. A major expansion in protease research has uncovered a variety of novel substrates, and it is now evident that proteases are critical pleiotropic actors orchestrating pathophysiological processes. Recent findings evidenced that the net proteolytic activity also relies upon interconnections between different protease and protease inhibitor families in the protease web. In this review, we provide an overview of these novel concepts with a particular focus on pulmonary pathophysiology. We describe the emerging roles of several protease families including cysteine and serine proteases. The complexity of the protease web is exemplified in the light of multidimensional regulation of serine protease activity by matrix metalloproteases through cognate serine protease inhibitor processing. Finally, we will highlight how deregulated protease activity during pulmonary pathogenesis may be exploited for diagnosis/prognosis purposes, and utilised as a therapeutic tool using nanotechnologies. Considering proteases as part of an integrative biology perspective may pave the way for the development of new therapeutic targets to treat pulmonary diseases related to intrinsic protease deregulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据