4.7 Article

The role and potential of morpholinium-based ionic liquids in dissolution of cellulose

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 204-212

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.05.011

关键词

Ionic liquids; Cellulose; Dissolution

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2016ZX05040-001]
  2. Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing [2462014YJRC001]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130007120007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effective dissolution of cellulose prepares for its subsequently full utilization. Ionic liquids (ILs) are attractive options for green dissolution of cellulose. A series of morpholinium-based ILs were synthesized and applied in dissolution of cellulose. The ultrasonic assisted saturated calcium chloride solution was used to activate cellulose. The remarkable decrease (from 87% to 65%) in crystallinity of cellulose facilitated dissolution process. The type of head-corn cations significantly increased polarity (E-T(30)) and hydrogen bond acidity (alpha) of ILs. N-Allyl-N-methylmorpholinium-based ILs showed the highest E-T(30) and alpha (59.11 kcal mol(-1) and 0.51) compared to 1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ILs (57.41 kcal mol(-1) and 0.46) and 1-Ally1-3-methylpyridinium-based ILs (49.36 kcal mol(-1) and 0.33) owing to the electron-rich center of oxygen in the morpholine ring. The type of anions dominated the ability to accept hydrogen bond of ILs. Formate, acetate and bisulfate contributed more hydrogen bond basicity (beta) (0.84, 0.88 and 0.91) for N-allyl-N-methylmorpholinium-based Its in comparison with other anions. Additionally, morpholinium-based ILs exhibited appropriate viscosity. Above-mentioned performances jointly improved the dissolution of cellulose in morpholinium-based ILs. This study demonstrated the potential of using morpholinium-based ILs as a class of efficient solvents to dissolve cellulose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据