4.2 Article

How Efficient Is Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Reducing Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease?

期刊

EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY
卷 77, 期 5-6, 页码 281-287

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000455208

关键词

Dyskinesia; Non-motor symptoms; Subthalamic deep brain stimulation; Effect size; Health-related quality of life

资金

  1. Hungarian Academy of Sciences [OTKA PD103964]
  2. Hungarian Brain Research Program [KTIA_13_NAP-A-II/10]
  3. Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary [UNKP-16-4-III]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dyskinesia is among the most troublesome symptoms of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The recently developed Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS) can simultaneously measure several subjective and objective aspects of dyskinesia, irrespective of the other motor symptoms of PD. Despite the advantages of deep brain stimulation (DBS), previous studies on DBS have not used the UDysRS yet. Methods: In this prospective study, 71 consecutive patients undergoing DBS implantation were enrolled. Patients were examined twice: 1 week prior to the DBS implantation (baseline) and 12 months postoperatively. The severity of PD-related symptoms was assessed by the Movement Disorders Society Unified PD Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The presence and severity of dyskinesia were specifically measured by the UDysRS and patient diaries. Results: At baseline, all 71 patients had dyskinesia, but 1 year after DBS implantation, 25 patients were dyskinesia-free, and an additional 19 had only mild dyskinesia. The total score on the UDysRS decreased from 38.0 +/- 17.8 to 10.8 +/- 13.0 (p < 0.001). Besides this, all parts of the UDysRS showed significant improvement after STN DBS treatment, and the magnitude of these changes had a large effect size. The total score of MDS-UPDRS improved from 76.5 +/- 24.3 to 60.4 +/- 21.4 points (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Based on our results, UDysRS can reliably detect improvements in dyskinesia after DBS implantation. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据