4.1 Article

Observed adducts on positive mode direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry - Proton/ammonium adduct selectivities of 600-sample in-house chemical library

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 4-10

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1469066717693851

关键词

Direct analysis in real time; DART; adduct selectivity; proton adduct; ammonium adduct; elemental composition; polarity; density functional theory calculation; retrospective study; high-resolution mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26350915] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, direct analysis in real time adduct selectivities of a 558 in-house high-resolution mass spectrometry sample library was evaluated. The protonated molecular ion ([M+H] (+)) was detected in 462 samples. The ammonium adduct ion ([M+NH4](+)) was also detected in 262 samples. [M+ H] (+) and [M+H-4](+) molecular ions were observed simultaneously in 166 samples. These adduct selectivities were related to the elemental compositions of the sample compounds. [M+NH4] (+) selectivity correlated with the number of oxygen atom(s), whereas [M+H](+) selectivity correlated with the number of nitrogen atom(s) in the elemental compositions. For compounds including a nitrogen atom and an oxygen atom [M+H](+) was detected; [M+NH4](+) was detected for compounds including an oxygen atom only. Density functional theory calculations were performed for selected library samples and model compounds. Energy differences were observed between compounds detected as [M+H] (+) and [M+NH4](+), and between compounds including a nitrogen atom and an oxygen atom in their elemental compositions. The results suggested that the presence of oxygen atoms stabilizes [M+NH4](+), but not every oxygen atom has enough energy for detection of [M+NH4](+). It was concluded that the nitrogen atom( s) and oxygen atom(s) in the elemental compositions play important roles in the adduct formation in direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据