4.2 Article

Molecular diagnosis of α-thalassemia in a multiethnic population

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 98, 期 6, 页码 553-562

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12866

关键词

alpha-thalassemia; molecular diagnosis; microcytic anemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: alpha-Thalassemia, one of the most common genetic diseases, is caused by deletions or point mutations affecting one to four alpha-globin genes. Molecular diagnosis is important to prevent the most severe forms of the disease. However, the diagnosis of alpha-thalassemia is complex due to a high variability of the genetic defects involved, with over 250 described mutations. We summarize herein the findings of genetic analyses of DNA samples referred to our laboratory for the molecular diagnosis of alpha-thalassemia, along with a detailed clinical description. Methods: We utilized a diagnostic algorithm including Gap-PCR, to detect known-deletions, followed by sequencing of the a-globin gene, to identify known and novel point mutations, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for the diagnosis of rare or novel deletions. Results: alpha-Thalassemia was diagnosed in 662 of 975 samples referred to our laboratory. Most commonly found were deletions (75.3%, including two novel deletions previously described by us); point mutations comprised 25.4% of the cases, including five novel mutations. Our population included mostly Jews (of Ashkenazi and Sephardic origin) and Muslim Arabs, who presented with a higher rate of point mutations and hemoglobin H disease. Overall, we detected 53 different genotype combinations causing a spectrum of clinical phenotypes, from asymptomatic to severe anemia. Conclusion: Our work constitutes the largest group of patients with alpha-thalassemia originating in the Mediterranean whose clinical characteristics and molecular basis have been determined. We suggest a diagnostic algorithm that leads to an accurate molecular diagnosis in multiethnic populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据