期刊
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 3-20出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0230-6
关键词
Bias; Causal inference; Causation; Counterfactuals; Potential outcomes; Effect estimation; Hypothesis testing; Intervention analysis; Modeling; Significance testing; Research synthesis; Statistical inference
I present an overview of two methods controversies that are central to analysis and inference: That surrounding causal modeling as reflected in the causal inference movement, and that surrounding null bias in statistical methods as applied to causal questions. Human factors have expanded what might otherwise have been narrow technical discussions into broad philosophical debates. There seem to be misconceptions about the requirements and capabilities of formal methods, especially in notions that certain assumptions or models (such as potential-outcome models) are necessary or sufficient for valid inference. I argue that, once these misconceptions are removed, most elements of the opposing views can be reconciled. The chief problem of causal inference then becomes one of how to teach sound use of formal methods (such as causal modeling, statistical inference, and sensitivity analysis), and how to apply them without generating the overconfidence and misinterpretations that have ruined so many statistical practices.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据