4.7 Review

Adjuvant interferon-α for the treatment of high-risk melanoma: An individual patient data meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 171-183

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.006

关键词

Individual patient data meta-analysis; Randomised controlled trials; Melanoma; Adjuvant interferon

类别

资金

  1. University of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit
  2. UK Department of Health, through National Coordinating Centre for Research Capacity Development - Natalie Ives
  3. Fonds Cancer, FOCA (BE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Many randomised trials assessing interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk malignant melanoma have been undertaken. To better assess the role of IFN-alpha, an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of these trials was undertaken. Methods: IPD was sought from all randomised trials of adjuvant IFN-alpha versus no IFN-alpha for high-risk melanoma. Primary outcomes were event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Standard methods for quantitative IPD meta-analysis were used. Subgroup analyses by dose, duration of treatment and various patient and disease-specific parameters were performed. Findings: Fifteen trials were included in the analysis (eleven with IPD). EFS was significantly improved with IFN-alpha (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, CI 0.81-0.91; P < 0.00001), as was OS (HR = 0.90, CI 0.85-0.97; P = 0.003). The absolute differences in EFS at 5 and 10 years were 3.5% and 2.7%, and for OS were 3.0% and 2.8% respectively in favour of IFN-alpha. There was no evidence that the benefit of IFN-a differed depending on dose or duration of treatment, or by age, gender, site of primary tumour, disease stage, Breslow thickness, or presence of clinical nodes. Only for ulceration was there evidence of an interaction (test for heterogeneity: P = 0.04 for EFS; P = 0.002 for OS); only patients with ulcerated tumours appeared to obtain benefit from IFN-alpha. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides clear evidence that adjuvant IFN-alpha significantly reduces the risk of relapse and improves survival and shows no benefit for higher doses compared to lower doses. The increased benefit in patients with ulcerated tumours, and lack of benefit in patients without ulceration, needs further investigation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据