4.3 Article

Effects of high-intensity interval training on cardiometabolic risk in overweight and obese African-American women: a pilot study

期刊

ETHNICITY & HEALTH
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 752-766

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2017.1294661

关键词

Cardiovascular health; exercise intervention; heart rate; treadmill; walking; jogging

资金

  1. American College of Sports Medicine Research Foundation Paffenbarger-Blair Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Little is known about high-intensity interval training (HIIT) in African-American (AA) women. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the effects of HIIT and steady-state (SS) exercise on cardiometabolic risk factors in young AA women. Design: A 16-week exercise intervention was conducted 3x/week. Twenty-seven AA women were randomized to SS (n=11; 32 continuous minutes of treadmill walking at 60-70% of maximum heart rate (HRmax)), or HIIT (n=16; 32 min of treadmill HIIT alternating 3 min at 60-70% of HRmax with 1 min at 80-90% of HRmax). Two-way repeated measures ANOVA with intention-to-treat analysis was used to identify changes between groups. Significance was accepted at P <= 0.05. Results: Of the 27 women who entered the study (age: 30.5 +/- 6.8 years; BMI: 35.1 +/- 5.1 kg/m(2); 5274 +/- 1646 baseline steps/day), 14 completed the intervention. HIIT significantly decreased waist circumference (107.0 +/- 11.3 to 105.1 +/- 11.9 cm) compared to SS, which showed no change. There was a significant time effect for steps where HIIT increased steps/day (5334 +/- 1586 to 7604 +/- 1817 steps/day), and SS had no change. There were no significant changes in either group for any other measurements. Conclusion: HIIT was more effective at reducing waist circumference and increasing daily steps/day than SS treadmill exercise over 16 weeks. Further research in a larger sample is indicated to evaluate the effects of each protocol on cardiometabolic risk factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据