4.6 Article

Intestinal epithelial cell injury induced by copper containing nanoparticles in piglets

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 151-156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2017.09.010

关键词

Intestinal epithelial cell; Nano copper; Oxidative; Nanotoxicology; Piglets

资金

  1. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2014CFB244]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011PY078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The nano copper has been widely used in modern clinical medicine practice. However, it has been noticed that nano copper particles induce cell injury and toxicity. The present study was designed to determine the effect of nano copper particles on cell injury of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) in piglets. The IECs were treated with different doses of nano copper (5, 10, 20 and 40 mu g/ml) for 24-48 h to observe cell injury and toxicity. Cell injury was measured based on morphological and other changes including oxidative stress and genes expression. The oxidative stress markers were assayed by differential expression levels of SOD, MDA and Metallothionein (MT) in addition to CTR1, SOD1, COX17, MT and ATOX1 genes expression. Cellular morphology showed an increasing growth of cells without nano copper treatment and nano copper showed significant damage to IECs with higher dose as compared to low dose. Higher doses of copper nanoparticles (10, 20 and 40 mu g/ml) have membrane damaging effect on the intestinal epithelial cells, whereas MDA contents and MT value were significantly increased, and SOD activity was decreased with the increase in concentration of nanoparticles. Nano copper up-regulated the CTR1 and SOD1 genes and down-regulated the relative expression of COX17, MT and ATOX1 genes significantly in a dose-dependent manner. The findings of the current study provide important insights that nano copper plays an important role in intestinal epithelial cell injury and oxidative stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据