4.5 Article

EFFECTS OF METALS ON ENANTIOSELECTIVE TOXICITY AND BIOTRANSFORMATION OF CIS-BIFENTHRIN IN ZEBRAFISH

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 2139-2146

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3747

关键词

Pyrethroids; Metals; Enantioselective toxicity; Enantioselective biotransformation; Zebrafish

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21377113, 21427815]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LR15B070001, LY17B070009]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-occurrence of pyrethroids and metals in watersheds previously has been reported to pose great risk to aquatic species. Pyrethroids are a class of chiral insecticides that have been shown to have enantioselective toxicity and biotransformation. However, the influence of metals on enantioselectivity of pyrethroids has not yet been evaluated. In the present study, the effects of cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and lead (Pb) on the enantioselective toxicity and metabolism of cis-bifenthrin (cis-BF) were investigated in zebrafish at environmentally relevant concentrations. The addition of Cd, Cu, or Pb significantly increased the mortality of zebrafish in racemate and R-enantiomer of cis-BF-treated groups. In rac-cis-BF-or 1R-cis-BF-treated groups, the addition of Cd, Cu, or Pb caused a decrease in enantiomeric fraction (EF) and an increased ratio of R-enantiomer residues in zebrafish. In 1S-cis-BF-treated groups, coexposure to Cd led to a lower EF and decreased residue levels of S-enantiomer. In addition, coexposure to the 3 metals resulted in different biodegradation characteristics of each enantiomer accompanied with differential changes in the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP)1, CYP2, and CYP3 genes, which might be responsible for the enantioselective biodegradation of cis-BF in zebrafish. These results suggest that the influence of coexistent metals should be considered in the ecological risk assessment of chiral pyrethroids in aquatic environments. Environ Toxicol Chem 2017; 36: 2139-2146. (C) 2017 SETAC

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据