4.7 Article

Enhanced phosphorus removal in intermittently aerated constructed wetlands filled with various construction wastes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 24, 期 28, 页码 22524-22534

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9870-z

关键词

Constructed wetlands; Phosphorus removal; Intermittent aeration; Construction waste; Microbial mechanism; Phosphorus mass balance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21507072]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2015PB001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600539, 2017T100495]
  4. Henan Province Science and Technology Major Project [161100310700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phosphorus (P) loss by various pathways in constructed wetlands (CWs) is often variable. The effects of intermittent aeration and different construction waste substrates (gravel, red brick, fly-ash brick) on P processing using six batch-operated vertical flow constructed wetlands (VFCWs) were studied for decentralized domestic wastewater treatment. Average removal of total phosphorus (TP) in three aerated CWs was markedly higher (21.06, 24.83, and 27.02 mg m(-2) day(-1), respectively) than non-aerated CWs (10.64, 18.16, and 25.09 mg m(-2) day(-1), respectively). Fly-ash brick offered superior TP removal efficiency in both aerated and non-aerated batch-operated VFCWs, suggesting its promising application for P removal in CWs. Aeration greatly promoted plant growth and thusly increased plant uptake of P by 0.57-1.45 times. Substance storage was still the main P sink accounting for 23.92-59.47% of TP removal. Other process including microbial uptake was revealed to be a very important P removal pathway (accounting for 14.86-34.84%). The contribution of microbial uptake was also indicated by microbial analysis. Long-term results suggested that the contribution of microbial P uptake could be always ignored and underestimated in most CWs. A combination of intermittent aeration and suitable substrates is effective to intensify P transformation in CWs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据