4.7 Article

Rainfall increases the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes within a riverine microbial community

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 473-478

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.04.036

关键词

Antibiotic resistance; River pollution; River microbial community; Rain; Anthropic impact

资金

  1. International Commission for the Protection of Italian-Swiss Waters (CIPAIS), Research Campaign

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infections with antibiotic resistant bacteria are among the major threats for human health. Studies elucidating the role of the environment in their spread are still in their infancy, it, however, seems that different environments might function as a long-term reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that reside within their microbial communities. An increasing number of studies target the presence and the persistence of ARGs in waters and soils that are exposed to human activities; they, however, rarely consider the spatial/temporal variability that predominate in these environments. Here we evaluated the effect of a moderate rain event (4 mm rain h(-1)) on the abundance and distribution of ARGs (tetA, ermB, bla(CTXM), sulll, and qnrS), by comparing measurements of gene abundances during the rainfall to the yearly average, in the waters of a large subalpine river. ARG abundances, which all increased during the rain event, were then correlated to several microbiological, physical and chemical variables, in order to establish their potential origin. Increments in ARG abundances during rainfall (total ARGs: 24 fold) was concomitant to an increase in total phosphorous, N-NH4, and microbial aggregates. Our results show a strong influence of a moderate rainfall on the abundances of ARGs, and suggest the catchment as their source. The impact of moderate rainfalls in areas exposed to anthropic activities should then be considered in modelling and management of ARG dynamics. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据