4.6 Article

Deformed Jarzynski Equality

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e19080419

关键词

classical Jarzynski equality; quantum Jarzynski equality; fluctuation theorems

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier-2 project [MOE2014-T2-2-119]
  2. WBS [R-144-000-350-112]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Education
  4. National Research Foundation of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The well-known Jarzynski equality, often written in the form e(-beta Lambda F) = < e(-beta W)>, provides a non-equilibrium means to measure the free energy difference Delta F of a system at the same inverse temperature beta based on an ensemble average of non-equilibrium work W. The accuracy of Jarzynski's measurement scheme was known to be determined by the variance of exponential work, denoted as var (e(-beta W)). However, it was recently found that var (e(-beta W)) can systematically diverge in both classical and quantum cases. Such divergence will necessarily pose a challenge in the applications of Jarzynski equality because it may dramatically reduce the efficiency in determining Delta F. In this work, we present a deformed Jarzynski equality for both classical and quantum non-equilibrium statistics, in efforts to reuse experimental data that already suffers from a diverging var (e(-beta W)). The main feature of our deformed Jarzynski equality is that it connects free energies at different temperatures and it may still work efficiently subject to a diverging var (e(-beta W)). The conditions for applying our deformed Jarzynski equality may be met in experimental and computational situations. If so, then there is no need to redesign experimental or simulation methods. Furthermore, using the deformed Jarzynski equality, we exemplify the distinct behaviors of classical and quantum work fluctuations for the case of a time-dependent driven harmonic oscillator dynamics and provide insights into the essential performance differences between classical and quantum Jarzynski equalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据