4.7 Article

Fracture analysis of double-layer hard and thick roof and the controlling effect on strata behavior: A case study

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 81, 期 -, 页码 117-134

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.07.029

关键词

Hard and thick roof; Fracturing; Microseismic monitoring; Ground control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574154, 51574155, 51474137]
  2. Tai'shan Scholar Engineering Construction Fund of Shandong Province of China, Taishan Scholar Talent Team Support Plan for Advantaged & Unique Discipline Areas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The movement of double-layer hard and thick main roofs during underground coal extraction via longwall top coal caving (LTCC) differs from that of other types of overlying strata. Therefore, numerous problems such as roadway instability, rockburst, and hydraulic cylinder damage will be encountered as a result of the instantaneous fracture of a double-layer hard and thick main roof. The key to controlling the behavior of strata is to understand the movement and fracture pattern of the double-layer hard and thick roof. The Xinhe mine was chosen for the case study because it is typical of the type of mine in which the LTCC method is adopted, and the minable coal seam usually underlies a double-layer, hard, and thick sandstone. The mining-induced fracturing and movement of the roof were investigated via microseismic (MS) monitoring. The structural characteristics affected by roof fracturing were determined, which helped in explaining the strong strata behavior. In addition, in order to control the local damage caused by the instantaneous fracture of the roof, a suitable long-hole pre-split blasting technique was adopted to weaken the strength and massiveness of the double-layer hard and thick roof. The total length of the longwall panel could be smoothly extracted without any further roadway instability after the systematic adoption of the proposed long-hole pre-split blasting technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据