4.5 Article

Wet meadow ecosystems contribute the majority of overwinter soil respiration from snow-scoured alpine tundra

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 121, 期 4, 页码 1118-1130

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003081

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DEB 1027341]
  2. NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research Improvement (DDRI) grant [BCS 1129562]
  3. Division Of Environmental Biology
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1027341] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We measured soil respiration across a soil moisture gradient ranging from dry to wet snow-scoured alpine tundra soils throughout three winters and two summers. In the absence of snow accumulation, soil moisture variability was principally determined by the combination of mesotopographical hydrological focusing and shallow subsurface permeability, which resulted in a patchwork of comingled ecosystem types along a single alpine ridge. To constrain the subsequent carbon cycling variability, we compared three measures of effective diffusivity and three methods to calculate gradient method soil respiration from four typical vegetation communities. Overwinter soil respiration was primarily restricted to wet meadow locations, and a conservative estimate of the rate of overwinter soil respiration from snow-scoured wet meadow tundra was 69-90% of the maximum carbon dioxide (CO2) respired by seasonally snow-covered soils within this same catchment. This was attributed to higher overwinter soil temperatures at wet meadow locations relative to fellfield, dry meadow, and moist meadow communities, which supported liquid water and heterotrophic respiration throughout the winter. These results were corroborated by eddy covariance-based measurements that demonstrated an average of 272 g Cm-2 overwinter carbon loss during the study period. As a result, we updated a conceptual model of soil respiration versus snow cover to express the potential for soil respiration variability from snow-scoured alpine tundra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据