4.7 Article

Silencing the Nucleocytoplasmic O-GIcNAc Transferase Reduces Proliferation, Adhesion, and Migration of Cancer and Fetal Human Colon Cell Lines

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2016.00046

关键词

O-GIcNAcylation; O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase; colon cell lines; colorectal cancer; siRNA

资金

  1. Liguc Contrc le Cancer/Comite du Nord
  2. Fondation ARC (Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer)
  3. Region Nord-Pas de Calais (Cancer Regional Program)
  4. University of Lille
  5. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The post-translational modification of proteins by O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GIcNAc) is regulated by a unique couple of enzymes. O-GIcNAc transferase (OGT) transfers the GIcNAc residue from UDP-GIcNAc, the final product of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP), whereas O-GIcNAcase (OGA) removes it. This study and others show that OGT and O-GIcNAcylation levels are increased in cancer cell lines. In that context, we studied the effect of OGT silencing in the colon cancer cell lines HT29 and HCT116 and the primary colon cell line CCD841CoN. Herein, we report that OGT silencing diminished proliferation, in vitro cell survival and adhesion of primary and cancer cell lines. SiOGT dramatically decreased HT29 and CCD841CoN migration, CCD841CoN harboring high capabilities of migration in Boyden chamber system when compared to HT29 and HCT116. The expression levels of actin and tubulin were unaffected by OGT knockdown but siOGT seemed to disorganize microfilament, microtubule, and vinculin networks in CCD841CoN. While cancer cell lines harbor higher levels of OGT and O-GIcNAcylation to fulfill their proliferative and migratory properties, in agreement with their higher consumption of HBP main substrates glucose and glutamine, our data demonstrate that OGT expression is not only necessary for the biological properties of cancer cell lines but also for normal cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据