4.6 Review

A Review of Compressive Sensing in Information Security Field

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 2507-2519

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2569421

关键词

Compressive sensing; theoretical security; application security; image cipher; chaos; optics

资金

  1. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [FDCT/009/2013/A1, FDCT/046/2014/A1]
  2. Research Committee within the University of Macau [MRG007/ZJT/2015/FST, MRG021/ZJT/2013/FST, MYRG2014-00031-FST, MYRG2015-00056-FST]
  3. Research Foundation of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province [GJJ150462]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Shenzhen University [201533]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61502399, 61402547, 61502314, 61572089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The applications of compressive sensing (CS) in the field of information security have captured a great deal of researchers' attention in the past decade. To supply guidance for researchers from a comprehensive perspective, this paper, for the first time, reviews CS in information security field from two aspects: theoretical security and application security. Moreover, the CS applied in image cipher is one of the most widespread applications, as its characteristics of dimensional reduction and random projection can be utilized and integrated into image cryptosystems, which can achieve simultaneous compression and encryption of an image or multiple images. With respect to this application, the basic framework designs and the corresponding analyses are investigated. Specifically, the investigation proceeds from three aspects, namely, image ciphers based on chaos and CS, image ciphers based on optics and CS, and image ciphers based on chaos, optics, and CS. A total of six frameworks are put forward. Meanwhile, their analyses in terms of security, advantages, disadvantages, and so on are presented. At last, we attempt to indicate some other possible application research topics in future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据