4.8 Article

Oxidative Burst-Dependent NETosisis Is Implicated in the Resolution of Necrosis-Associated Sterile Inflammation

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00557

关键词

necrosis; inflammation; nanodiamonds; NETosis; resolution; reactive oxygen species

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [CRC1181-C03, KFO257, SPP 1468]
  2. EU H-MSCE-RISE project [690836 PANG]
  3. Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine project [0115U000055]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [81273286]
  5. DFG [GK1660]
  6. Ardea Biosciences, Inc.
  7. Science and Technology of the Sichuan province [2015HH0050]
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  9. Friedrich-Alexander Universitat Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Necrosis is associated with a profound inflammatory response. The regulation of necrosis-associated inflammation, particularly the mechanisms responsible for resolution of inflammation is incompletely characterized. Nanoparticles are known to induce plasma membrane damage and necrosis followed by sterile inflammation. We observed that injection of metabolically inert nanodiamonds resulted in paw edema in WT and Ncf1** mice. However, while inflammation quickly resolved in WT mice, it persisted over several weeks in Ncf1** mice indicating failure of resolution of inflammation. Mechanistically, NOX2-dependent reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps were essential for the resolution of necrosis-induced inflammation: hence, by evaluating the fate of the particles at the site of inflammation, we observed that Ncf1** mice deficient in NADPH-dependent ROS failed to generate granulation tissue therefore being unable to trap the nanodiamonds. These data suggest that NOX2-dependent NETosis is crucial for preventing the chronification of the inflammatory response to tissue necrosis by forming NETosis-dependent barriers between the necrotic and healthy surrounding tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据