4.6 Article

FOXC1 is associated with estrogen receptor alpha and affects sensitivity of tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 275-287

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.990

关键词

Breast cancer; estrogen receptor; FOXC1; TCGA; triple negative

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573454]
  2. National Science, Technology Major Projects for Major New Drugs Innovation and Development [2013ZX09508104, 2013ZX09402203]
  3. CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine (CAMS-I2M) [2016-I2M-3-007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FOXC1 is a member of Forkhead box transcription factors that participates in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. Our previous study demonstrated that FOXC1 was highly expressed in triple-negative breast cancer. However, it remains unclear what is the relation between FOXC1 and ER alpha and if FOXC1 regulates expression of ERa. To explore relation between FOXC1 and ERa and discover regulation of ERa expression by FOXC1 in breast cancer, we analyzed data assembled in the Oncomine and TCGA, and found that there was significantly higher FOXC1 expression in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer than that in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Overexpression of FOXC1 reduced expression of ERa and cellular responses to estradiol (E2) and tamoxifen in the MCF-7 FOXC1 and T47D FOXC1 cells, while knockdown of FOXC1 induced expression of ER alpha and improved responses to estradiol (E2) and -tamoxifen in BT549 FOXC1 shRNA and HCC1806 FOXC1 shRNA cells. In addition, overexpression of FOXC1 reduced expression of progesterone receptor (PR), Insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), and XBP1 (X-Box Binding Protein 1) and significantly reduced luciferase activity caused by E2 using ERE luciferase reporter assay. These results suggested that FOXC1 regulated expression of ER alpha and affected sensitivity of tamoxifen treatment in breast cancer, and that FOXC1 may be used as a potential therapeutic target in ERa-negative breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据