4.4 Article

The semi-inclusive jet function in SCET and small radius resummation for inclusive jet production

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2016)125

关键词

Perturbative QCD; Resummation

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  2. LDRD program at Los Alamos National Laboratory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new kind of jet function: the semi-inclusive jet function Ji(z, omega(J), mu), which describes how a parton i is transformed into a jet with a jet radius R and energy fraction z = omega(J)/omega with omega(J) and omega being the large light-cone momentum component of the jet and the corresponding parton i that initiates the jet, respectively. Within the framework of Soft Collinear Effective Theory (SCET) we calculate both J(q)(z, omega(J), mu) and Jg(z, omega(J), mu) to the next-to-leading order (NLO) for cone and anti-k(T) algorithms. We demonstrate that the renormalization group (RG) equations for J(i)(z, omega(J), mu) follow exactly the usual DGLAP evolution, which can be used to perform the In R resummation for inclusive jet cross sections with a small jet radius R. We clarify the difference between our RG equations for J(i)(z, omega(J), mu) and those for the so-called unmeasured jet functions J(i)(omega(J), mu), widely used in SCET for exclusive jet production. Finally, we present applications of the new semi-inclusive jet functions to inclusive jet production in e(+)e(-) and pp collisions. We demonstrate that single inclusive jet production in these collisions shares the same short-distance hard functions as single inclusive hadron production, with only the fragmentation functions D-i(h) (z, mu) replaced by J(i)(z, omega(J), mu) . This can facilitate more efficient higher-order analytical computations of jet cross sections. We further match our In R resummation at both LLR and NLLR to fixed NLO results and present the phenomenological implications for single inclusive jet production at the LHC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据