4.1 Article

Patterns of use, harm reduction strategies, and their relation to risk behavior and harm in recreational ketamine users

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 358-369

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/00952990.2016.1141211

关键词

Harm reduction strategies; ketamine; drug-related harms; drug user; risks

资金

  1. Asociacion Bienestar y Desarrollo - Energy Control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recent studies have shown that ketamine use has serious adverse consequences. However, no studies have focused on the strategies that users carry out to protect themselves from such potential harm. Objectives: (i) analyze harm reduction strategies, risk behaviors, and harms in nonmedical/recreational ketamine users; (ii) analyze the association of their harm reduction strategies and risk behaviors with harms they report. Methods: An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey of 462 persons who had used ketamine in the past year. We designed a questionnaire to collect information on their risk behaviors, harm, and harm reduction strategies. Results: The harms most reported were unexpected confusion (58.2%), memory impairment (57.4%), and abrupt mood/behavior changes (49.6%). The most frequent strategies were spacing out sessions (60.8% always/almost always did this), spacing out doses within a session (54.5%), and limiting the amount and not going over it (41.3%). The use of these three strategies was related to a lower probability of perceiving negative consequences associated with ketamine use, including memory impairment, healthcare assistance, psychological dependence, and risk behaviors related to driving under the influence of ketamine. Conclusions: This study provides empirical evidence on strategies related to the lower probability of harm associated with ketamine use as employed by recreational ketamine users. Our findings suggest that efforts to minimize harm from ketamine use should focus on increasing awareness of potential harms and the use of identified harm reduction strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据