4.4 Article

Hippocampus-based contextual memory alters the morphological characteristics of astrocytes in the dentate gyrus

期刊

MOLECULAR BRAIN
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13041-016-0253-z

关键词

Astrocyte; Hippocampus-based contextual memory; Morphological changes; GFAP; EAATs; Connexin 43

资金

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project of Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs of the Republic of Korea [HI3C1451]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2011-0021866]
  3. Brain Korea 21 PLUS program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes have been reported to exist in two states, the resting and the reactive states. Morphological changes in the reactive state of astrocytes include an increase in thickness and number of processes, and an increase in the size of the cell body. Molecular changes also occur, such as an increase in the expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). However, the morphological and molecular changes during the process of learning and memory have not been elucidated. In the current study, we subjected Fvb/n mice to contextual fear conditioning, and checked for morphological and molecular changes in astrocytes. 1 h after fear conditioning, type II and type III astrocytes exhibited a unique status with an increased number of processes and decreased GFAP expression which differed from the typical resting or reactive state. In addition, the protein level of excitatory excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) was increased 1 h to 24 h after contextual fear conditioning while EAAT1 did not show any alterations. Connexin 43 (Cx43) protein was found to be increased at 24 h after fear conditioning. These data suggest that hippocampus-based contextual memory process induces changes in the status of astrocytes towards a novel status different from typical resting or reactive states. These morphological and molecular changes may be in line with functional changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据