4.5 Article

An exception to the matched filter hypothesis: A mismatch of male call frequency and female best hearing frequency in a torrent frog

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 419-428

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2621

关键词

acoustic structure; Amolops torrentis; auditory brainstem response; auditory sensitivity; matched filter hypothesis; stream noise

资金

  1. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS
  2. CAS Light of West China Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31270042]
  4. Youth Professor Project of CIB [Y3B3011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The matched filter hypothesis proposes that the tuning of auditory sensitivity and the spectral character of calls will match in order to maximize auditory processing efficiency during courtship. In this study, we analyzed the acoustic structure of male calls and both male and female hearing sensitivities in the little torrent frog (Amolops torrentis), an anuran species who transmits acoustic signals across streams. The results were in striking contradiction to the matched filter hypothesis. Auditory brainstem response results showed that the best hearing range was 1.6-2 kHz consistent with the best sensitive frequency of most terrestrial lentic taxa, yet completely mismatched with the dominant frequency of conspecific calls (4.3 kHz). Moreover, phonotaxis tests show that females strongly prefer high-frequency (4.3 kHz) over low-frequency calls (1.6 kHz) regardless of ambient noise levels, although peripheral auditory sensitivity is highest in the 1.6-2 kHz range. These results are consistent with the idea that A. torrentis evolved from nonstreamside species and that high-frequency calls evolved under the pressure of stream noise. Our results also suggest that female preferences based on central auditory system characteristics may evolve independently of peripheral auditory system sensitivity in order to maximize communication effectiveness in noisy environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据