4.4 Article

Outcomes of emergent embolisation of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma in a western population

期刊

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
卷 70, 期 7, 页码 730-735

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.03.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To evaluate the authors' experience with interventional radiological management of tumour rupture in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a Western population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive patients treated at a single institution with transcatheter embolisation for ruptured HCC between 2000 and 2013. Patient age, sex, aetiology of liver disease, degree of underlying liver dysfunction, and clinical presentation were assessed. Embolisation was performed in a selective fashion when possible. Success, complications, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were treated with embolisation for ruptured HCC. Of these patients, nine, nine, and five patients were Child-Pugh Class A; B, and C respectively. Embolisation was successful in 22 patients; one patient remained haemodynamically unstable and transfusion dependent despite embolisation. No major complications occurred. Median survival time was 260 days and the 30 day and 1 year survival rates were 83% and 45%; respectively. Child-Pugh class B or C (p = 0.04), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score greater than 10 (p = 0.04), lobar embolisation (p = 0.04), and presence of portal vein thrombosis (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter embolisation is effective at controlling haemorrhage in patients with ruptured HCC. Although major procedural complications are low, embolisation should proceed with an understanding of poor prognosis in patients with decompensated liver disease. Superselective embolisation is associated with improved prognosis and should be performed when feasible. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据